P. v. Harris
Defendant Cindy Lee Harris appeals a judgment convicting her of possession for sale of methamphetamine. The evidence against defendant was seized pursuant to a search warrant based upon information provided by a confidential informant and contained in the sealed portion of the supporting affidavit. Following an in camera hearing, the trial court found that the affidavit should remain sealed to protect the identity of the confidential informant and that defendants motion to quash the warrant should be denied. Defendant asks that we review the trial courts findings pursuant to the procedures set forth in People v. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4th 948 (Hobbs). Court have reviewed the sealed affidavit and find no error in the courts decision. Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Harris