Miller v. Mercury Casualty Co.
The case involves an insurance coverage dispute. The core issue is whether the trial court erred in determining that the defendant/respondent Mercury Casualty Company (Mercury) was under no obligation to defend plaintiffs and appellants Edward N. Miller and Denise L. Miller (Millers) in their underlying litigation with Kelly S. Lawson and Kelly Hunt-Miceli (Lawsons) involving the sale of a renovated home located in Marin County, California. The Millers were the sellers and the Lawsons were the buyers. For the reasons hereafter stated, Court affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Comments on Miller v. Mercury Casualty Co.