JAMES CLAYWORTH v. PFIZER, INC PART III
Where various retail pharmacies filed suit against drug company for alleged price-fixing and defendant contended plaintiffs suffered no loss because plaintiffs "passed-on" claimed overcharges to customer, plaintiffs suffered no loss under the Cartwright Act because the act requires actual monetary loss by plaintiffs; pass-on defense is available to defendants accused of price-fixing under California antitrust law.
Comments on JAMES CLAYWORTH v. PFIZER, INC PART III