JAMES CLAYWORTH v. PFIZER, INC PART I
Where various retail pharmacies filed suit against drug company for alleged price-fixing and defendant contended plaintiffs suffered no loss because plaintiffs "passed on" claimed overcharges to customer, plaintiffs suffered no loss under the Cartwright Act because the act requires actual monetary loss by plaintiffs; pass on defense is available to defendants accused of price fixing under California antitrust law.
Comments on JAMES CLAYWORTH v. PFIZER, INC PART I