Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Lorena Rodriguez appeals from the courts order denying her motion to vacate the default judgment entered against her. She claims the court abused its discretion in denying the motion because it was filed within two years of the entry of judgment and because she demonstrated that she never received actual notice of the proceedings against her. More specifically, she argues that she was never properly served with the summons and complaint. As we shall explain, her arguments lack merit. Appellant failed to demonstrate grounds for relief under Code of Civil Procedure sections[1]473.5 or 473. Appellant did not carry her burden to show she lacked actual knowledge of the action or that service of the summons or complaint was defective. Consequently, Court affirm.
Comments on Rodriguez v. Rodriguez