Archambault v. Padilla
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Lynn Helen Archambault (Archambault) appeals from a judgment after court trial that she has no right or interest in the real property of defendants and cross-complainants Brian Padilla and Diana Davenport-Padilla, as Trustees of the Padilla 2004 Revocable Trust (Padilla), or the real property of defendants and cross-complainants Albert E. Prather, Fred Borges, and Joann M. Borges (hereafter, collectively, Prather), and no right to any water on the property of Padilla or Prather. Archambault contends the court erred in concluding (1) she had not established a prescriptive easement to use water on the Prather property, (2) she had not established an equitable easement or irrevocable license to use water on the Prather property, and (3) she had not established a prescriptive easement to lay and maintain pipes, tanks, and other water system infrastructure across the Prather property.
Court reverse the judgment in part and remand so that the trial court may define the easement described in the opinion. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Archambault v. Padilla