In re O.H.
M.F., the mother of O.H., L.F., Je.F., and Jo.F (the minors), appeals from orders of the juvenile court denying her petitions for modification without an evidentiary hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, 388)[1]and terminating her parental rights ( 366.26, 395). Mother makes three contentions of alleged prejudicial error in the proceedings, including a claim that the courts denial of mothers request for an evidentiary hearing on her petitions constituted reversible error. Disagreeing with each of those claims, Court affirm.
Comments on In re O.H.