In re R.C.
After five years as a ward of the juvenile court, R.C. was found to be in violation of his probation, and he was committed to the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ). He contends (1) he was statutorily ineligible for a DJJ commitment, (2) the court abused its discretion in committing him, (3) the court failed to exercise discretion in setting the maximum term of physical confinement, and (4) the court erred by failing to find that he was a special education student and transferring his current Individual Education Plan (IEP) to the DJJ. The last two contentions have merit; Court affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
Comments on In re R.C.