P. v. Qazza
Suleiman Abd Qazza (appellant) appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate a 1994 no contest plea. We appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed a brief that set forth the facts and procedural history of the case. Counsel presented no argument for reversal but asked this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel presented one possible but not arguable issue on appeal: whether the court properly advised appellant of the immigration consequences of his plea. Court granted appellant 30 days to file a supplemental brief. In his responsive brief, appellant also asserts that the trial court failed to adequately advise him of the immigration consequences of his 1994 no contest plea. court have now reviewed the entire record and find no error in the trial courts order. The order and the judgment are therefore affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Qazza