legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Lair v. Vinci
Plaintiff Marc Lair appeals from a supplemental postjudgment order in execution of a judgment for property (Code Civ. Proc., 714.020, subds. (b), (c))[1] determining the value of certain personal property (a navigation/communication system or GPS) to be $9,000 and awarding that amount to defendant Ronald Vinci. Lair contends (1) the trial court violated his due process rights by admitting oral testimony from Vinci's witnesses at a hearing on that matter and (2) the navigation system, which had been installed in an aircraft awarded to Vinci in a judgment for possession, was not included within that judgment and cannot be subject to the supplemental order under section 714.020. Court reject these contentions and affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale