Moreno v. Coronel
Later, Moreno discovered that the employers policy might actually apply, because Coronel had had the employers permission to use the car. Moreno promptly sought to rescind the release based on fraud and misrepresentation. One supposed misrepresentation was the denial of coverage by the employers insurer. Another was the tender of $15,000 by Coronels insurer, which Moreno argued was effectively a representation that there was no other applicable insurance. The trial court granted summary judgment for Coronel. Court affirm.
Comments on Moreno v. Coronel