PEOPLE v. THOMPSON Part II
Where concerned citizen followed defendant, who was driving dangerously and under the influence of alcohol, through city streets before defendant sped away and citizen called police; police went to house and spoke to defendant, who remained inside the house and was visibly intoxicated; defendant refused to come outside to have his blood tested for the presence of alcohol; and police became anxious about the dissipation of alcohol in his bloodstream, exigent circumstances supported officers' warrantless entry into home in order to effectuate arrest for drunk driving.
Comments on PEOPLE v. THOMPSON Part II