legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.H.
D.H. appeals from an order of wardship pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 upon a finding that she committed three counts of second degree robbery, counts 1, 2, and 5 (Pen. Code, 211) and two counts of attempted second degree robbery, counts 4 and 6 (Pen. Code, 664/211). She was placed in the camp-community placement program and a maximum period of confinement was set at 12 years and nine months. She contends there was insufficient evidence to establish she was the person who ripped O.I.s necklace from around her neck and count 1, therefore, should not have been sustained. She also contends the court erred in calculating the maximum term of confinement. For reasons stated in the opinion we affirm the order of wardship and remand the matter to the juvenile court for a recalculation of the maximum term of confinement.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale