legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Simon v. Hartunian
On May 3, 2004, appellant David Simon filed a second amended complaint naming, among others, respondents the Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company and Teruko Dahn (collectively Coldwell), respondents Mike and Claire Hartunian and the Hartunian Family Trust (collectively Hartunian). Eight of the 16 causes of action named respondents Coldwell and Hartunian as defendants. Hartunian and Coldwell filed motions for summary judgment respectively on November 1 and 2, 2007. The trial court granted both motions on January 22, 2008, on the ground that appellants action was barred by res judicata as a result of the judgment entered in the Estate of Simon (B193611), which was affirmed by Division Five of this Court of Appeal on July 18, 2007, in a nonpublished opinion. Court refer to that appellate decision and opinion as Simon I. Court agree with the trial court and therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale