Vue v. Lobos
There can be no doubt that plaintiff Adam Vue suffered grievous injuries in a horrific incident in which he was shot by an unknown assailant while test driving a car owned by defendant East Bay Mitsubishi while accompanied by defendant Gabriel Lobos, a salesman at the Mitsubishi dealership. The question is whether defendants can be held liable for those injuries. Because we conclude that defendants did not owe Vue a duty of care, we answer that question in the negative. Court therefore affirm the summary judgment for defendants.
Comments on Vue v. Lobos