P. v. Yang
Following a retrial, appellant Lao Sonny Yang was convicted by a jury of residential burglary (Pen. Code, 459)[1] and grand theft of a vehicle ( 487, subd. (d)(1)). On appeal, he contends the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of other misconduct pursuant to Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b) (section 1101(b)), and in admitting evidence that appellant was convicted of receiving stolen property at his first trial in this matter. Finding no error, Court will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Yang