legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re X.I.
L.R. (Mother) appeals the juvenile courts orders (1) denying her petition for a finding of changed circumstances (Welf. & Inst. Code, 388);[1]and (2) terminating her parental rights to her son, X.I. ( 366.26, subd. (b)(1)). Mother makes two contentions. First, Mother contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying her petition for a finding of changed circumstances, because Mother proved that (1) her circumstances had changed, and (2) it was in X.I.s best interests to provide Mother with services. Second, Mother asserts that the juvenile court erred by terminating her parental rights to X.I. because substantial evidence supported a finding that Mother and X.I. have a beneficial relationship. Counsel for X.I. submitted a letter brief requesting that the juvenile courts orders be affirmed. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale