In re B.E.
R.E. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile courts orders summarily denying her petition to reinstate family reunification services with respect to her seven-year-old son, B.E., and terminating her parental rights. She also contends that because the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) failed to provide adequate notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C., 1901 et seq. (ICWA) the juvenile court erred in finding that the Act did not apply. Court affirm the courts order denying a hearing on Mothers petition to reinstate family reunification services, but Court reverse the order terminating parental rights, and remand with directions to provide proper ICWA notice.
Comments on In re B.E.