legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Aguilar
Defendant Christian Aguilar appeals from a judgment sentencing him to life in prison without the possibility of parole (LWOP) and a consecutive 25 years to life term after a jury found him guilty of first degree murder with special circumstances and found a firearm allegation to be true. He contends his due process rights were violated by the admission of evidence of a prior uncharged offense. Court conclude no such violation occurred. However, as defendant argues and the Attorney General concedes, the trial court erroneously imposed and stayed a parole revocation fine. That fine must be stricken, since defendant is not entitled to parole under his LWOP sentence. Finally, although amendment of the abstract of judgment is not required to reflect the striking of the parole revocation fine because that fine was never recorded in the abstract, the abstract of judgment nevertheless must be amended because it fails to show defendants LWOP sentence.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale