Schuelke v. Quinn
Respondent Darren Quinn petitioned the trial court to confirm an arbitration award. Appellants Judith and Dennis Schuelke opposed and petitioned to vacate the award. The trial court granted the petition to confirm. It denied the Schuelkes' motion to vacate the award. The Scheulkes contend the trial court erred because the arbitrator substantially prejudiced their rights by: (1) improperly giving them erroneous legal advice that they did not need expert witness testimony; (2) refusing to consider their evidence supporting the malpractice claim; and (3) refusing to grant them a continuance to obtain expert testimony. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Schuelke v. Quinn