Zemer v. Schreiber
Jack D. Zemer appeals from a judgment entered against him in his lawsuit against Daniel Schreiber and David Perez (sometimes defendants) following a trial conducted by a referee stipulated to by the parties. (Code Civ. Proc., 638, subd. (a).) Zemer contends the Referee erred in ruling that (1) an agreement entered into by the parties was not sufficiently definite and certain to constitute a binding contract, and (2) Zemer is not entitled to equitable relief that would recognize such an agreement was created on the basis of promissory estoppel. Court conclude that the Referee's decision is well supported by the record and applicable law, because these parties did not create a binding agreement and Zemer's claim of promissory estoppel is without merit. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Zemer v. Schreiber