legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BONNER v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Part II
Where former county employees elected deferred retirement; county's retirement law did not give them right to make any further elections that would be afforded to other county employees after their departure; subsequent change in county's retirement law rendered former employees' positions eligible for more generous retirement benefits; and new law said that qualifying employees could elect to have their service prior to new law be treated prospectively as safety service but did not authorize benefit eligibility of deferred members to be determined by changes made after their deferred retirement, trial court properly granted county's motion for summary judgment in suit alleging that county improperly failed to calculate deferred retirement benefits in accordance with new law.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale