legal news


Register | Forgot Password

People v. Travis part II
Penal Code Sec. 296.1--mandating collection of DNA samples and print impressions for collection and storage in a state database from every person convicted of a felony, every person found not guilty of a felony by reason of insanity, and every person adjudicated as a juvenile offender based on commission of a felony--does not violate Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement since benefits of such collection and storage outweigh felons' limited privacy rights. Sec. 296.1 does not violate the equal protection rights of convicted felons, who are not similarly situated to other persons with respect to the purposes that DNA sample collection and storage are intended to serve. Extension of DNA sample collection requirement to all felons does not violate due process even as amended to include all felony offenders within the DNA testing requirement since statute is minimally intrusive, does not infringe on privacy rights that are recognized as reasonable, and serves a compelling state interest. Section 296.1 does not impose punishment so its extension of DNA sampling requirements does not violate ex post facto clauses as applied to defendant convicted after statute's effective date of offense that would not have subjected him to such requirements under law in effect on date of crime.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale