legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.Y.
Y.Y. is the father of many children who have been removed from his custody and that of the childrens mother due to the parents substance abuse problems. The couples two youngest children have been freed for adoption after neither parent could successfully reunify with them within statutory permissible time limits. Father appeals from the order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26 ) to his two youngest children.[1]

Fathers appointed appellate counsel submitted a letter filed July 28, 2009, advising this court that she would not be filing a brief pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952. We extended time for father to personally file a letter brief which he has since done. In his letter, he describes his current circumstances and his desire to have his children returned to him.
However, he does not argue that the juvenile court committed any error in deciding to terminate his parental rights. Court thus conclude appellants remarks do not amount to claims that the juvenile court committed an error affecting the outcome of this case (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994) and will affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale