In re N.M.
A.M. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26 ) to her four children.[1] Appellants appointed appellate counsel submitted a letter dated July 14, 2009, advising that no brief would be forthcoming (In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952). We extended time for appellant to personally file a letter brief which she later did. In her letter, she contends she did everything that was required of her under the court-ordered plan for reunification and deserves a second chance to be a parent to her children. Having reviewed the appellate record as summarized below, we conclude appellants argument does not establish that the juvenile court committed any error affecting the outcome of this case (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994) and will affirm.
Comments on In re N.M.