In re C.G.
Mother appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her four children under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1]She argues that her parental rights should not have been terminated because the juvenile court should have applied the beneficial parental relationship exception and beneficial sibling relationship exception to termination of her parental rights. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i) & (v)).[2]
We conclude mother waived these issues on appeal by not asserting them in the trial court. Furthermore, mother did not meet her burden of establishing the exceptions applied. Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re C.G.