legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.S.
.S. (mother) appeals from a superior court order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26)[1]. She contends we should review the superior courts earlier decision to deny her reunification services ( 361.5, subd. (b)(10)) because she claims she received incorrect notice of her remedy in this court. She also challenges the superior courts subsequent decision to deny a modification petition ( 388) she filed seeking to reunify with her son. In her view, the court misunderstood the relief she sought and therefore did not exercise its discretion. Alternatively, she argues she was entitled to modification of the order denying her services because there was substantial evidence to support her claims. On review, Court disagree with mothers contentions and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale