In re D.E.
D.E. (Father) and C.B. (Mother) appeal from the order terminating parental rights to their son, D.E. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26.)[1] Father contends he was not given adequate notice of the proceedings, the juvenile court erred by summarily denying his section 388 petition, and he was entitled to reunification services. Father and Mother both contend the juvenile court erred by failing to apply the parental benefit exception to termination of parental rights. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Court find no error and affirm the order.
Comments on In re D.E.