In re J.A.
M.A. (Father), father of J. and A., appeals from the juvenile courts findings and orders made at the 12-month review hearing. Father contends (1) the court erred in finding a substantial risk of detriment to A. if she were returned to his care, (2) he was denied reasonable reunification services with regard to visitation with J., and (3) the juvenile court erred by delegating authority to J. to decide whether visitation with Father would occur. Court affirm.
Comments on In re J.A.