P. v. Scoggins
Appellant Harold Lamar Scoggins challenges two conditions of probation imposed following his no contest plea to a charge of grand theft. (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (c).) He claims the trial court erred in conditioning probation on his agreement not to use alcohol, and that he submit to regular drug and alcohol testing at a cost not to exceed $10 each month.
Court conclude that any objection to the first condition was waived by appellants failure to object at the time probation was granted. On the merits, Court also conclude that imposition of the conditions was not an abuse of discretion.
Comments on P. v. Scoggins