legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Poe
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him of counts 1, 3, 9, 11, 15, and 16. He also challenges his conviction of attempted rape (count 15), arguing that he cannot be convicted of both attempted rape and sexual penetration of the same victim by a foreign object (count 14). Finally, appellant contends that the concurrent prison terms imposed for counts 6, 7, 12, 15, and 16 should have been stayed. We agree that the terms imposed for counts 7 and 15 should have been stayed, and we modify the judgment accordingly. However, because counts 2 and 12 charge the same burglary, Court vacate the conviction on count 12. Court reject appellants remaining contentions and affirm the judgment as modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale