legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sandel v. R2D2
Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 8, 2008. The complaint alleged that defendant Bergstein and his partner, Ron Tudor, work in the movie business making and distributing films through various entities. Beginning in 2004, defendant Bergstein came to plaintiff seeking loans to facilitate the businesses. Plaintiff agreed to make the loans in exchange for oral and written promises of repayment with interest. As of July 2005, plaintiff had loaned defendant the sum of $5,725,000. As of February 2006, with interest, the balance due to plaintiff exceeded $6,650,000. In a compromise agreement, plaintiff and defendant Bergstein agreed that the balance due would be $6,650,000. On March 1, 2006, defendants executed an Amended and Restated Consolidated Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $4.5 million. Defendants acknowledged receipt of consideration supporting the note. Defendants agreed but have failed to make periodic payments. In the fraud claims, defendants are alleged to have executed the note and represented a second note would be executed to reflect the balance of the loan owed. Defendant Bergstein made the representations without any intent of repaying the loans or fully documenting the full amount of the obligations. He also induced plaintiff to remove UCCs that had been filed and encumbered assets belonging to the various entities.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale