legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.G.
In a CVS pharmacy store, A.G., a minor, walked down the alcohol aisle and put a bottle of Grey Goose vodka into his coat pocket. He hesitated a moment and then pocketed a second bottle. He walked out of the store without paying for them. He was arrested and the juvenile petition charged him with commercial burglary (count 2) and petty theft (count 3). The juvenile court considered this petition along with two others (containing additional robbery charges) before sustaining all the counts and imposing a total maximum term of five years and six months. Relevant to this appeal, the juvenile court imposed consecutive sentences for the CVS commercial burglary and petty theft counts.
A.G. and the Attorney General agree the trial court erred in imposing a consecutive sentence for count 2 (four months) and count 3 (two months) pursuant to Penal Code section 654. (All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.) We also agree the sentence was in error. The record shows A.G. possessed a single objective and engaged in a single, continuous course of conduct when he committed these crimes, i.e., to steal alcohol from the store. There is ample case authority holding a defendant must be punished only once if he is convicted of both burglary and theft arising from the same criminal event. (See People v. Bernal (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1455, 1457-1458.)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale