legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Smith
In this appeal after resentencing, Larry Lionell Smith contends that he did not enter an open plea to the charges against him and that his counsel provided ineffective assistance. Court disagree. Court begin with a brief review of the history of the case. At the preliminary hearing, the arresting officer testified that on July 27, 2007, he observed Smith driving a car. The officer recognized Smith from previous traffic stops and knew that he was on parole. He also recognized Smiths passenger as a parolee. He decided to conduct a traffic stop because Smith and his passenger were on parole; he did not observe any traffic violation. In the ensuing parole search of Smiths car, the officer recovered from inside the trunk of the car a clear plastic baggy containing four additional baggies within that bag containing large clusters of an off-white substance resembling cocaine base. The parties stipulated that lab analysis revealed that the substance in the baggy was 23.63 grams of cocaine base.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale