P. v. Arana
Pedro Arana appeals the judgment following his conviction for kidnapping to commit robbery (Pen. Code, 209, subd. (b)(1)), and second degree robbery ( 211). The jury found he personally used a handgun in the offenses. Arana contends there was insufficient evidence to support the aggravated kidnapping conviction. He also claims instructional error, and error in ordering Arana to pay attorney fees and the cost of a probation department investigation. Court will reverse the attorney fee order. Otherwise, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Arana