In re D.C.
David C. (father) appeals from the judgment and orders of May 26, 2009, declaring his daughter, D.C. (D.), a dependent of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 360, subdivision (d).[1] He contends substantial evidence does not support the jurisdictional finding. He further contends the dispositional order requiring father to participate in a parenting program was an abuse of discretion. We conclude the jurisdictional finding is supported by substantial evidence, and, as father failed to object to the dispositional order in the dependency court, he has forfeited the issue. In any event, the dispositional order was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re D.C.