In re P.Y.
Susie Y. (mother) appeals following the court order finding her two daughters (born 2007 and 2009) dependents of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b).[1] Contrary to mothers contentions,[2]substantial evidence supports the courts jurisdictional findings and the order removing the children from her care. Nor did the court abuse its discretion in ordering monitored visits, with the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) having authority to liberalize visitation.
Comments on In re P.Y.