P. v. Costales
George Christian Costales appeals a judgment following his conviction of stalking. (Pen. Code, 646.9, subd. (a).)[1] We conclude, among other things, that: 1) substantial evidence supports the judgment, and 2) Costales has not shown that his two-year prison sentence was retaliation for his decision to proceed to trial instead of making a plea to the charges. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Costales