legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Calhoun
Gary Steven Calhoun appeals from the judgment entered after his conviction by a jury on five counts of lewd conduct upon a child, contending the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the verdicts against him, the trial court improperly admitted evidence of uncharged acts of lewd conduct involving children, the court erroneously instructed the jury as to the burden of proof to be applied in considering those uncharged acts and the court erred when it refused to stay the sentences on four counts under Penal Code section 654. Calhoun further contends imposition of a 16‑year sentence violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial under Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham) and constituted cruel and unusual punishment. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale