legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Morgan
Karla Suzanne Morgan appeals from a judgment reinstating her on probation in two Napa County cases (case Nos. CR140073 & CR142633) following her admission of probation violations. Her attorney on appeal has raised no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.

Appellant was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings. Her no contest pleas to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11377) and possession of a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, 12020, subd. (a)) were validly entered in case No. CR140073. Her no contest plea to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, 459) in case No. CR142633 was also validly entered. She thereafter admitted violating her grant of probation by failing to submit to drug testing and by testing positive. She was again reinstated on probation on the condition that she waive custody credits, which she did. Waiver of custody credits to avoid a state prison commitment was proper. Judgment affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale