Marriage of Hole
This appeal arises from a dissolution proceeding. We do not reach the merits because appellant Donald Hole has not supplied the court with a record on appeal and his opening brief violates the California Rules of Court in significant respects.
As best we can make out, appellant was sued for divorce by respondent Bernadette Marie Hole. The couple apparently owned residential property located in Tracy, which at some point became subject to a lis pendens filed by respondent. Because of this filing, appellant was unable to sell the property. The property went into foreclosure, and appellant filed for bankruptcy protection. Apparently, the trial court at some point entered a judgment against appellant in the dissolution proceeding for $100,000 based on an agreement under which respondent apparently relinquished her rights in the property. Appellant clearly thinks the judgment is wrong, but has not identified in any intelligible way his claims of error.
Comments on Marriage of Hole