FORCE FRAMING, INC v. CHINATRUST BANK
Force Framing, Inc. (Force Framing) sued Chinatrust Bank (U.S.A.), Corp. (Chinatrust) for a bonded stop notice.[1] (Civ. Code, § 3083.) The trial court granted Chinatrust's cross-motion for summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c), because Force Framing served the statutorily required 20-day preliminary notice (Civ. Code, § 3097) on East West Bank, not Chinatrust. Force Framing contends that the trial court erred by granting Chinatrust's cross-motion for summary judgment because East West Bank qualified as the â€
Comments on FORCE FRAMING, INC v. CHINATRUST BANK