Hamilton v. Soukup
Paul C. Hamilton, a state prisoner, appeals from the trial court's order sustaining defendants' demurrer to his complaint alleging deliberate indifference to his need for outdoor exercise while the prison was on lockdown status.
As Court will explain, court agree with Hamilton that the trial court erred in concluding that he had not exhausted his administrative remedies. However, we conclude that another ground for demurrer has merit, namely that Hamilton failed to comply with the Government Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 810 et seq.). Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Hamilton v. Soukup