Falossi v. Koenig
Plaintiff David Falossi and defendant Fritz Koenig are neighbors; they live on opposite sides of Hoot Owl Trail in Yucca Valley. Shortly after Koenig moved in, Falossi and his family decided that they wanted nothing to do with him -- because they suspected him of being a pedophile, or because they disagreed with his plans for Hoot Owl Trail, or for both reasons, or perhaps for neither. They told him to stay away from the Falossi children.
Nevertheless, a long series of interactions between Koenig and the Falossis ensued. Koenig's conduct fell at various points along a continuum from the harmless and reasonable to the annoying and inexcusable. In many (though not all) of these interactions, Koenig's conduct consisted of photographing or videotaping the Falossis against their will.
The trial court granted a permanent injunction prohibiting Koenig from harassing the Falossis. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6.) The injunction required him to stay at least 50 yards away from them and from their home. It further provided: â€
Comments on Falossi v. Koenig