P. v. Cho
A jury found defendant guilty of attempting to willfully commit a lewd or lascivious act upon a child under the age of 14 years. (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 288, subd. (a).)[1] The trial court granted defendant 36 months of formal probation, with the condition that he serve 180 weekend days in the custody of the county sheriff. Defendant raises two contentions. First, defendant contends that the evidence supporting his conviction does not meet the substantial evidence standard. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the transcripts of his online chats. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cho