P. v. Schockner
Appellant, Manfred Schockner appeals his murder conviction resulting in a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Before this court appellant complains the trial court erred in (a) denying a motion to suppress evidence collected by the police while executing a search warrant and (b) in sustaining certain hearsay objections. He also claims the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by eliciting overly prejudicial evidence from a prosecution witnesses and by misstating evidence during the closing argument. As explained below, we conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress evidence and did not abuse its discretion in ruling on the hearsay objections. In addition, appellant has failed to demonstrate that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct. Accordingly, Court affirm appellant's conviction.
Comments on P. v. Schockner