PEOPLE v. WILLIAM COOK ENNIS II
William Cook Ennis II was convicted of various crimes involving sexual molestation of his daughter, then age 8, and his stepdaughter, then age 14. He was sentenced to prison for an aggregate term of 64 years.[1]
Ennis' primary contention on appeal is that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support his convictions. He acknowledges there was testimony which, if believed, was sufficient to establish he did commit the crimes of which he was convicted, but argues that testimony was inherently improbable – by which he means full of contradictions, inconsistencies and implausibilities – and thus no rational jury could have relied upon it as a basis to convict. The contention is unpersuasive.
The â€
Comments on PEOPLE v. WILLIAM COOK ENNIS II