In re A.Z.,
Albert Z. (Father) appealed from the juvenile court's order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, then two‑year‑old A.Z. Father contended the juvenile court erred by finding inapplicable the parent-child relationship exception to the termination of parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i). In his appellate briefs, Father asserted, inter alia, his concern that A. â€
Comments on In re A.Z.,