P. v. Chatman
A jury convicted defendant, Raymond Chatman, of assault with a deadly weapon, i.e., a hammer (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1))[1] and exhibiting a deadly weapon (§ 417, subd. (a)(1)). He was granted probation and appeals claiming the trial court erred in excluding statements he made, refusing to give instructions on self-defense and imposing the costs of some services provided to him. Court reject his contentions and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Chatman