Childs v. Rio Hondo College
Kenneth W. Childs (Childs) appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of Rio Hondo College (Rio Hondo) and Robert Termath (Termath) on Childs's complaint for negligence. The question presented is whether a police academy and its instructors owe a duty to train and supervise a cadet so he does not damage his career by sexually harassing another cadet during a class exercise. Applying the factors in Patterson v. Sacramento City Unified School Dist. (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 821 (Patterson), Court conclude that the law imposes no such duty.
Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Childs v. Rio Hondo College